- Type
- Quiz
- Course
- ENG507 Phonetics and Phonology
- Size
- PDF 5.6 MB
- Updated
- 23 Oct 2026
You get 3 free files a day on the website. Add the Chrome extensionSign in with the extension for 30 a day.
Preview text
Text from pages 1, 2, 3 of 18. Download the file for all 18 pages.
In phonetics and phonology, speech sounds (segments) using basic units of contrast are defined as gestures – they are treated as the abstract characterizations of articulatory events with an intrinsic time dimension. Thus sounds (segments) are used to describe the phonological structure of specific languages and account for phonological variation. In this type of description in phonetics and phonology, sounds are the underlying units which are represented by classes of functionally equivalent movement patterns (gestures).
Nasal manners of articulation are commonly found in the languages of the world. Like stops, nasal can also occur voiced or voiceless (for example, in Burmese, Ukrainian and French) though in English and other most languages nasals are voiced. As voiceless nasals are comparatively rare, they are symbolized simply by adding the voiceless diacritic [ ̥ ] under the symbol for the voiced sound. There are no special symbols for voiceless nasals and it is written as /m ̥ / - a combination of the letter for the voiced bilabial nasal and a diacritic indicating voicelessness.
Fricative as an articulatory gesture may be divided into voiced or voiceless sounds but we can also subdivide fricatives in accordance with other aspects of the gestures that produce them. For example, some authorities have divided fricatives into sounds such as [s], in which the tongue is grooved so that the airstream comes out through a narrow channel, and those such as [θ], in which the tongue is flat and forms a wide slit through which the air flows. On the other hand, a slightly better way of dividing fricatives is to separate them into groups on a purely auditory basis.
The only English lateral phoneme, at least in British English, is /l/ with allophones [l] as in led [lɛd] and [ɫ] as in bell [bɛɫ]. In most forms of American English, initial [l] has more velarization than is typically heard in British English initial [l]. In all forms of English, the air flows freely without audible friction, making this sound a voiced alveolar lateral approximant. It may be compared with the sound [ɹ] in red [ɹɛd], which is for many people a voiced alveolar central approximant. Laterals are usually presumed to be voiced approximants unless a specific statement to the contrary is made. Source-filter theory is an important concept in acoustic phonetics. It is a model of speech (e.g., vowel) production. According to this theory, source refers to the waveform of the vibrating larynx. Its spectrum is rich in harmonics, which gradually decrease in amplitude as their frequency increases. The various resonance chambers of the vocal tract, especially the movements of the tongue and lips, act on the laryngeal source in the manner of a filter (see filtered speech), reinforcing certain harmonics relative to others. Thus the combination of these two elements (larynx as source and cavity as filter) is known as the source-filter model of speech (e.g., vowel) production. We have already discussed that speech sounds can differ in pitch, loudness, and quality. Now if we understand the idea of source-filter we would be able to analyze these changes as possible variation in speech sounds. When discussing differences in quality, we noted that the quality of a vowel depends on its overtone structure (i.e., formants). Now putting this idea another way, we can say that a sound (e.g., vowel) contains a number of different pitches simultaneously. There is the pitch at which it is actually spoken, and there are the various overtone pitches that give it its distinctive quality. We distinguish one vowel from another by the differences in these overtones. The overtones are called formants, and the lowest three formants distinguish vowels from each other.
In this theory, the tract is represented using a source-filter model and several devices have been devised to synthesize speech in this way. The idea is that the air in the vocal tract acts like the air in an organ pipe, or in a bottle. Sound travels from a noise-making source (i.e., the vocal fold vibration) to the lips. Then, at the lips, most of the sound energy radiates away from the lips for a listener to hear, while some of the sound energy reflects back into the vocal tract. The addition of the reflected sound energy with the source energy tends to amplify energy at some frequencies and damp energy at others, depending on the length and shape of the vocal tract. The vocal folds (at larynx) are then a source of sound energy, and the cavity (vocal tract - due to the interaction of the reflected sound waves in it) is a frequency filter altering the timbre of the vocal fold sound. This idea can make it very easy for us to understand the formants of a vowel sound. Thus this same source-filter mechanism is at work in many musical instruments. In the brass instruments, for example, the noise source is the vibrating lips in the mouthpiece of the instrument, and the filter is provided by the long brass tube.
The formants that characterize different vowels are the result of the different shapes of the vocal tract. Any particle of air, such as that in the vocal tract or that in a bottle, will vibrate in a way that depends on its size and shape. Remember that the air in the vocal tract is set in vibration by the action of the vocal folds (in larynx). Every time the vocal folds open and close, there is a pulse of acoustic energy (activation). Irrespective of the rate of vibration at source (of the vocal folds), the air in the vocal tract will resonate at these frequencies as long as the position of the vocal organs remains the same. All voiced sounds are distinguishable from one another by their formant structure (frequencies). This idea could be understood by considering the vocal tract as a tube and thus the concept is when the vocal fold pulses have been produced at a steady rate, the “utterance” is on a monotone. In other words, what you hear as the changes in pitch are actually the changes in the overtones of this monotone “voice.” These overtone pitch variations convey a great deal of the quality of the voiced sounds. The rhythm of the sentence is apparent because the overtone pitches occur only when the vocal folds would have been vibrating.
Using computer programs, we can analyze vowel sounds by showing their components through the display (spectrogram). In spectrograms, time runs from left to right, the frequency of the components is shown on the vertical scale, and the intensity of each component is shown by the degree of darkness. It is thus a display that shows, roughly speaking, dark bands for concentrations of energy at particular frequencies—showing the source and filter characteristics of speech. Remember that the traditional articulatory descriptions of vowels are related to the formant frequencies. The first two frequencies are important here. The first formant (F1) is inversely related to the height of a vowel whereas the second formant (F2) is related to the frontness of a vowel sound. When the first two formants are taken, the vowels of a language can be plotted on a chart and the structure is very much related to the traditional description of vowel sounds.
The acoustic properties (structure) of consonantal sounds are usually more complicated than that of vowels. Usually, a consonant can be said to be a particular way of beginning or ending a vowel sound because during the production of a consonant there is no distinguishing feature prominently visible. There is virtually no difference in the sounds during the actual closures of voiced stops [b, d, g], and absolutely none during the closures of voiceless stops [p, t, k], because there is only silence at these points. Each of the stop sounds conveys its quality by its effect on the adjacent vowel. We have seen that during a vowel such as [u], there will be formants corresponding to the particular shape of the vocal tract. In the case of consonants, these changes are not really distinguishable (particularly for obstruents).
- Voiced - vertical striations corresponding to the vibrations of the vocal folds
- Bilabial - locus of both second and third formants comparatively low
- Alveolar - locus of second formant about 1700–1800 Hz.
- Velar - usually high locus of the second formant
- Retroflex - general lowering of the third and fourth formants
- Stop - gap in pattern (with burst for voiceless and sharp formant beginning for voiced stops)
- Fricative - random noise pattern in higher frequency regions
- Nasal - formant structure similar to that of vowels (with formants at 250, 2500, and 3250)
- Lateral - formant structure similar to that of vowels (with formants at 250, 1200, and 2400)
- Approximant - formant structure similar to that in vowels, usually changing.
Related ENG507 files
All ENG507 files →Get more out of VUBuddy, for free
- Unlimited downloads
- The explanation behind every MCQ answer
- Study offline on slow data
- 30 downloads a day instead of 3
- Sign in and buy Pro Semester here
One Pro Semester membership works in both the extension and the app.